More thoughts on the Zimmerman Trial

Chris L explained it in a discussion I saw on facebook recently  better than I've seen anyone explain it yet.

I contend that (1) the only racist on the grounds that night was Trayvon Martin. He's the only one who said racist words and who profiled someone based upon their appearance.

(2) Trayvon Martin's actions made his observation by Zimmerman justified. Not that there needs to be any justification at all. You are within your rights and freedoms to observe anyone in public places, to take their photo, and to watch them.
(3) Zimmerman spent as much of the time as possible during the incident ON THE PHONE with Police. Trayvon didn't call the police, he called a friend to brag about his up coming confrontation. In that call he used racist language. He also made a damning admission that he would be returning from close to the residence he was staying at BACK up to the area where Zimmerman was to confront him.
(4) This part is rather crucial. You've heard much about who was stalking who and who followed who. Well, Zimmerman claimed and all evidence presented at trial is consistent with Trayvon casing houses suspiciously that night in a complex that was subject to a string of home invasions / robberies. He was suspicious enough for Martin to call Police and this behavior is not inconsistent with his history.
You might not have heard this, but Martin was a vandal who was caught on tape vandalizing school property. A lack of respect for the law and for property rights. When he was detained his backpack was searched for the marker he used to tag the school property and they found him to be in possession of fine jewelry and a burglary tool (flathead screwdriver) that were reported missing from a home not far from his school. So it's not just idle speculation that Trayvon was a thief and that his suspicious behavior was benign. Of course Zimmerman didn't know this at the time, but if we are to weigh the veracity of all the evidence presented that Martin was not simply walking straight home from his Skittles purchase, then it certainly adds a pattern of behavior that is consistent with what Zimmerman testified to and reported to the police before he could have known that Martin actually was a thief.

(5) If you watch the entire video of Zimmerman walking the police through the events of that night and look at an aerial view of the map of the location and compare the time stamps of calls and known events, it's rather clear that Zimmerman did not stalk Martin until he was cornered or threatened which precipitated the attack. In fact, all evidence and eye witness testimony confirms that Zimmerman never walked down the direct path that Martin disappeared down before Zimmerman got out of his car. Martin had time to make it all the way down that street and back to confront Zimmerman.

While we don't know his exact location, his own words while he was on the phone, the time scale, and the fact that when Zimmerman stopped at the T-junction at the top of that street to see if he could see Martin he neither saw him nor heard Martin on the phone.
(5) Zimmerman's injuries match his story and the actual shooting doesn't show a frenzied malice and desire to kill Martin. It was only one shot after Zimmerman had already been taken to the ground, beaten on, and Martin went for Zimmerman's gun.
(6) The timeline, eye witnesses, and physical locations fit Zimmerman's story and they show that he did nothing which warranted being assaulted, nor was he quick to pull a gun, nor did he use it inappropriately. Zimmerman broke no law. Trayvon Martin did.